Keats’ grandfather Essay

I handled Death of a Naturalist, although it wasnt pretty and it wasnt nice. Sometimes it wasnt correct inter diversityable a poetry, more like a story that I keep relate to, for I used to gather frogspawn and watch the wee tadpoles develop into frogs.I like the fact that it is a modern poem, that Heaney lived in N. Ireland and that this is probably a personal memory. It makes it interesting for me I often love where that flax-dam is, or if it is still around, or if it looks as I imagine.I like the charge there be no specific rules followed by this poet, that Heaney doesnt onlyow them to rule his poem, and that we get that precious bit of small fry information. That is what makes the poem different, unique and special. Then the change in atmosphere alters the poem, makes it frightening, and I can laugh at the barbarian here because that never happened to me.Comparison of Keats and Heaneys different lieus and techniquesKeats lived in 19th century England and Heaney live d in 20th century N. Ireland, so their outlooks on life are bound to be different, reflecting on their poetry.Keats lived at a time when poets were born, not made, and those who were poets tended to be top(prenominal) class gentlemen who did not need to earn an income. So the odds were zoftig against him from the start. He was born in 1795 and came from a lower class family and when he was ten the first of many tragedies struck him, changing his personality evermore. His military chaplain was thrown from his horse, killing him, therefore Keats mother remarried, and almost immediately subsequently Keats grandfather died.While Keats and his siblings moved in with their grandmother his mother disappeared, and then reappeared a few years later, ill with tuberculosis. Keats nursed her until she died and after that his attitude to the world changed. He then trained to be an apothecary and passed the examination in 1816It was at this time that Keats started to write poetry. Although Keats was considered a Romantic poet romanticism at that time was a rebellion, the lead figures being Coleridge and Wordsworth, who were under sullen criticism.In 1818 the tuberculosis that would kill Keats showed itself, probably contracted from his brother turkey cock who Keats had nursed. While under the strain of his illness he met Fanny Brawne, with whom he fell in love with, and in September 1819 Keats wrote many odes including Ode to surrender, despite his sickness.He died in 1821 when he was expert 26. Keats had a short, blood-and-guts life, and his poetry reflected that. He was passionate, and never did anything by halves he put all his effort into it. In Ode to decline Keats writes fervently about his autumn as he sees it.However Heaney was born almost 145 years after Keats in 1939. He lived at the family farm in Mossbawn. In 1961 he took a first in side of meat at Queens College, and two yr. later took up a position as an slope lecturer there.His poetry began un der the guidance of Philip Hobsbaum, an English poet whose work problematical his interest in natural imagery, with occasional violence filtered through. Heaney used these ideas in his work, and was also influenced by Ted Hughes, a personal friend and fellow poet.Heaneys poem is about constitution turning nasty, and at time Heaney had already lived through World War II, so the world seemed like a dark place at that time. This poem may be Heaney let loose this thought.Keats and Heaney both see things passionately, and paint a vivid intense translate of it, they microscope what they see, like that they are similar, but the similarities end there as what they do see is very different. Keats sees the beautiful tiptop of nature and Heaney to the bare underlying of nature.The most obvious differences in these two poems are the techniques, as Keats and Heaney are far a array in years their language and various techniques differ. Keats uses disused language, which was probably commo n in those days, while some of Heaneys address are very close to speech. Keats language accompanies his classic English expressive style of poem, uses the traditional metre in conjunction with that customary style of English poem. Heaneys poem uses the metre along with alliteration, assonance, onomatopoeia, punctuation and scatological wrangling to get his message across Heaneys often strong talking to mean that your throat even moves like a frog.In Ode to Autumn Keats writes as if he is removed from the autumn scene, watching from afar. An air of solace detachment surrounds it, and it is more of an expression of This is how it is than I feel. Keats autumn is a picture frozen in time, beautiful and un last ageless for him. He sees it as it is then, and not the decay, which will eventually take over. Keats refuses to see that, and is an idealist, thought process that things stay as you see them, but in a way they do for Keats because we see it in the poem and he sees it in his effect point the same forever, and the poem is a way of forever preserving it.Heaneys nature has a darker meaning, beneath the surface there is many layers to nature, this is just iodine, one of the many. However the same is not true for Keats as his nature is more simple and idealistic. Heaney chooses to show us that nature is splendid, but underneath the cover it is also frightening. He is looking for answers because we only ever see break dance of the story (like in the poem, we only ever see the story from the childs point of view), because we dont know everything. We have to get up and learn from our experiences, and this is Heaneys experience, and there is a change in the child from being a child emotionally and being protected from things like that, and being an adult, as he grows and learns.Heaney allows us to feel and see the secure force of nature, the horror, and see that we cannot control it, but that the decay can. The decay equals the change in nature, and is a m etaphor for the change in the child. We are part of nature and while we are not controlled by the change caused by decay what we see and feel and thus learn from changes us.Keats nature is a divine force, nothing, not even decay can change it for Keats. The power of this poem is supposed to bring alive for us autumn as Keats sees it. Thats what Romanticism is about, turning something that an ordinary person would see as perhaps disgusting, into something beautiful and wonderful. For Keats art cures everything, it didnt matter that he was dying of tuberculosis but it did matter that he wrote this poem.I think Heaney is try to show that maybe we are taught to see things by society, and nature is the wild truth e.g. the child is taught at school about the frogspawn but not how it is made, not mentioning the sexual reproduction involved. Nature is a better instructor than man, it teaches about that, it teaches about recycling in the decay.It is not enough for Heaney to just watch nat ure like Keats does. He must be involved in nature. He gets his wellington boots out and gets stuck in. This most likely comes from having lived on a farm, and having all the experiences he did. Keats poem came from his ultimately dreamy heart, forever impractical on looking at things as they are.