Leadership Discovery Project Essay

As we chatted I explained to him the waterlogged underdrawers sort began in the mid 1980s with the birth and spread of hip-hop. I recover so well, pulling my oversize mens knickerbockers overpower to my hips. The look was actu every(prenominal)y slimming to a larger girl like me as an added bonus. I besides, remember, our assistant principal c exclusivelying several of us into the sanction and telling us to pull up our knickers or be sent home, with zeros for the day. I am pretty sure that we did as he asked, at least until he turned around whateverway.Sometime later, I learned the soggy pant style I sported (well into my 20s) had invalidating beginnings. The style allegedly began as a salute to prison attire, which consisted of oversized pants and shirts. Often the pants would be falling down and inmates were non allowed to have a bang. An early(a) claim is even more disturbing. Supposedly, the pants worn low, hanging down, were an invitation for sex in the prison wor ld. Perhaps, I invariably thought, several(prenominal) kid just could non afford a belt and started walking around holding up his britches the best he could.every way, baggy pants they came and they have endured. (Parker, 2009) Some kids may be awake the style is reminiscent of prison attire. They might actually embrace the idea. The mass of the kids, however, who exhibit baggy pants, ar more likely interested in looking like their peers, emulating musicians and actors, and wearing some liaison that is defiant of the conservative nature of authority. Having a glance at someones underwear can be offensive. It can be downright aggravating.Even the president has chimed in on the controversial subject of baggy jeans. He said during his 2008 campaign( to MTV), There atomic number 18 some issues we face, that you get int have to pass a law, solely that doesnt mean folks cant have some sense and some respect for otherwise masses, and you know some people might non fate to see y our underwear Im one of them. (Blunk, 2012) I would have to agree with the president that I dont want to see the underwear of young men with pants on the ground. By the same standard, though, I would also like not to see, but cracks of older men hanging out, men in speed shorts who expose their scrotum, muffin tops, thong underwear revealed, cops in beef man boots, camel toes, and PLEASE, NO leggings worn by anyone over the age of ten. However bothersome, ugly, gross, annoying, disrespectful, or distasteful baggy pants argon or any other fashion fiasco none qualify as a adept reason to pass a law. If baggy pants are tie in to crime especially gang crime such as lawmakers in Hawkinsville, GA, Trenton, NJ, and several towns in Louisiana claim, then it seems a fair ypothesis that all cowboy boot cops are racist, but crack revealers are minor molesters and any woman who bears her thong is surely a ho. With a system such as this, racial profiling or any other profiling for tha t matter get out kick the bucket tools of the past. All we will need to ask is, what were they wearing? (Walton, 2011) (Parker, 2009) In spite of the fact that many a(prenominal) people do not appreciate the appearance of baggy jeans, outlaw them is a counterproductive way to promote moral code or reduce crimes committed by young people.Pants are not a driving factor behind crime statistics. What leads to a emotional state of crime are elements like socio-economics, education or lack of, accounting of crime in a family, and other situational elements. (Parker, 2009) It is not the baggy pants we have to worry about but, rather, the brain affiliated to the neck, connected to the torso, connected to the legs that hold the pants up. Unless you take into shape, of course, the one benefit to law enforcement that baggy pants bring to the t sufficient they are detrimental to the objective of runIt seems to me that a cop would only hope for criminal wearing baggy jeans when in pur suit Simply put, baggy jeans are a constabulary officers best friend. (Feb. 17th, 2012) There is always an article of clothes or fashion statement for Americans to consider offensive. In the past it was anti-short skirts for women, anti-long sensory hair for men, and anti-leather jackets for all. We graduated to anti-glove, anti-piercings, and anti-hoodie. But, the style and hatred for it. that has endured longest is anti-baggy pants. (Walton, 2011)Americans are often conscience-smitten of setting limits on the issues that are irrelevant. If there is a rail shoot supply more cameras and metal detectors, if the classrooms are crowded and kids wont listen then drug everyone up, and if kids are texting on cell phones bit driving and dying from it then create a bumper sticker. Geeze If we are worry about violence, crime, or the unsuccessful lives of young people, why then do we not set real, stern, limits on the things that hurt young people most(prenominal) guns, drugs, autom obiles, alcohol, tobacco and caffeine ?Perhaps this is because all of these things make money for a lot of people in our country. So, we go after the one thing that cannot talk back a pair of pants. Or can they? Julius hart was arrested in 2011 in Riviera Beach, Florida for wearing pants that were considered too low exposing at least four inches of his boxer shorts. He spent the night in jail and was fined $150. 00. He decided to take the case to court and challenge the law. He claims wearing baggy pants is his constitutional right and he is hurting no one. The case is pending in the West ad come Beach Court. . (Feb. 17th, 2012,)This is just one example of what I like to retrieve of as the rise of the baggies, but there are more. When the West Virginia raise of Representatives tried to outlaw the wearing of low-slung pants circa 2007, they received ridicule from Sydney to London. Comedians joked about a boxers rebellion, and there were so many contrast online political blogs the state Senate quickly killed the bill. (Parker, 2009) This mockery has not stopped other politicians from trying to eradicate the fashion we know as the baggies. Bans have become law or are being considered in at least eight states.The movement is fueled by growing worries that sloppy dress by Americas youth could be related to delinquency, execrable learning and crime. (Parker, 2009) Elements of our society are obsessed with what the youth is trying to contain in their attire. For me, however, the concern lies more in what they are not expressing in their attire I am not secure, I am not seeking a professional position, I am not able to stand apart from my crowd of peers. I do not commit laws can solve attire concerns such as this only education, consideration and personal motivation will do the job.There is racial sermon surrounding this debate. Many people, including law makers and religious affiliates, in all racial groups see this primarily as a low-spirited issue. Noth ing could be further from the truth. If you walk down the halls of any white middle school or high school you will find there are many white boys wearing pants, low and baggy. The style is no longitudinal associated as a hip-hop trend. It is cross-culture, crosses over socio-economic boundaries, and can be associated with also punk, grunge, and mod, all trends that have surfaced in recent years. This is not a black issue as much as some may want it to be.Although I am resistant to this being racial issue, I am glad that many of the laws proposing bans on baggy pants have been met with bulwark and action by the American Civil Liberties Union and the NAACP (National Association for the procession of Colored People). This is not just racial profiling. It is wardrobe profiling. I run a risk this means that all men in expensive suits are sledding to steal my retirement fund, or perhaps my son, who got cold in the home and put his hoodie onis actually a gun toting gang member. conc eivably a Supreme Court case for this would read, The U. S. Supreme Court against clothe It makes me wonder if we are actually being manipulated by the powers that beinto a society of nudity. Maybe they just want to see us all naked. I think I will stick with the baggy pants. (Blunk, 2012) lax Drawers, baggies, or just pants on the ground, as they are referred to, are a fashion statement. For some, wearing them may mean a smallish more, for others they are only following the crowd. Some say its a ridiculously stupid, annoying, and sloppy way to dress. Others do not bother to accusation either way. Many folks connect these pants to criminal behavior. I do not and furthermore, I find it absurd that others do.